Research ethics review committees (RECs) review the ethical acceptability of research involving human participants and use of their biological samples and personal data. The growth of international collaborative, data-intensive, and population-based projects has led to duplicated efforts and potentially inconsistent ethics reviews of the same study across participating research sites. In order to establish a common baseline, the GA4GH Regulatory & Ethics Work Stream (REWS) has developed the Ethics Review Recognition Policy. This policy provides a framework of essential elements for improving mutual recognition among RECs. It helps national, local, and institutional regulators and policymakers, as well as international, regional, or national accreditation systems.

Image summary -
Benefits
- Provides best practices for recognising ethics reviews conducted by another country
- Encourages the reduction of duplicative ethics reviews
Target users
Ethics review committees
Publications
Documents
| Date | Title |
|---|---|
| 14 September 2023 | Code of Ethics and Community Conduct (CECC) |
| 8 July 2020 | Ethics Review Recognition Policy (v2.0) |
| 13 February 2017 | GA4GH Ethics Review Recognition Policy (v1.0) |
Contributors
Don't see your name..?
Get in touch- Edward DoveEthics Review Recognition Policy LeadUniversity of Edinburgh
- Eva Bermejo-SánchezInstituto de Salud Carlos III
- Shu Hui ChenNIH National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Bethesda
- Aida Beatriz Falcon de VargasHospital Vargas de Caracas
- Amalia IssaMcGill University / Université McGill, Montréal, Canada
- Dianne NicholUniversity of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
- Pilar NicolasIndependent Contributor, University of the Basque Country
- Vasiliki RahimzadehBaylor College of Medicine
- Matthieu SchapranowHasso Plattner Institute for Digital Engineering
- Eva WinklerGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) / National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg